The Gold Report Weekly Wrap-Up

Check out this week’s stories and updates, with commentary from Dr. Simone Gold

Gold Report Staff

May 31, 2025

Explore this week’s op-eds from Dr. Gold:

WATCH: The PAS Report with Dr. Simone Gold - Lies, Censorship and Corruption

PRE-ORDER NOW! ‘Selective Persecution: The Legalization of American Fascism’ — by Dr. Simone Gold, foreword by Dennis Prager

The WHO’s Pathogen Profiteering Scheme Is Holding Up the Pandemic Treaty

On May 20th, the World Health Organization (WHO) announced that its member states had adopted a so-called Pandemic Agreement to “make the world more equitable and safer from future pandemics.” But a closer look reveals that much of the agreement has not actually been agreed upon. This article explores what remains unresolved in the WHO’s Pandemic Agreement and who stands to profit from it.

One of the most alarming components still under negotiation is the Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing (PABS) System. This scheme would incentivize countries to hunt for dangerous pathogens and hand them over to the WHO. In turn, the WHO would broker contracts for the mass production of tests, vaccines, and so-called “medical countermeasures” across all member states. In other words, the WHO wants to erect a trillion-dollar pandemic industry, enriching its officials and their billionaire benefactors like Bill Gates. The Gates Foundation, which aggressively invests in vaccines and pharmaceutical “solutions,” just happens to be the WHO’s second-largest donor. Now, with PABS, the Foundation stands to cash in on the very system it helped build—while WHO bureaucrats dole out contracts to corporations and cronies, using taxpayer money funneled in through member-state “contributions.”

The playbook is obvious. First, the WHO declares the Pandemic Agreement “adopted.” The latest draft is more subtle than earlier versions, dampening public backlash. Next comes the sleight of hand: negotiate the most dangerous provisions, like PABS, in private. Out of sight, out of mind—while globalist elites and unelected health officials cut secret deals behind closed doors, funded by you.

Thanks to President Trump, the U.S. has exited negotiations and will not sign the agreement under his watch. But the threat remains. The WHO has not gone away—and neither have the profiteers lurking behind the veil of “public health.” We must stay vigilant. Our medical freedom depends on it.

The NSA Doesn’t Need a Warrant to Watch You

Is the NSA conducting illegal surveillance of American citizens? Before 2013, few would have believed it. But Edward Snowden’s bombshell disclosures confirmed what many suspected: the U.S. government has indeed spied on private American citizens, and likely continues to do so to this day. This article examines some of the NSA’s surveillance tools, the data it collects, and some of its documented violations of Americans’ constitutional rights.

It’s no secret that authoritarian governments spy on their people. In places like North Korea or China, it’s standard operating procedure. But in the United States, where privacy and liberty are supposed to be protected, such abuses are intolerable. And yet, the NSA’s mass surveillance of American citizens, the Biden FBI’s unlawful spying on hundreds of thousands of Americans—particularly targeting Conservative Americans—and the Department of Homeland Security’s use of invasive AI technology, all paint a picture of an increasingly lawless surveillance state.

Still, each revelation of such illegal surveillance by the federal government is a wake-up call. It’s a reminder of something our Founding Fathers understood well: government does not grant freedom. Our liberty comes from God, not from bureaucrats in Washington. Government’s job is to protect that liberty—but it is not, by nature, good or trustworthy. Power corrupts, and even governments led by the supposedly “well-intentioned” will ultimately trample rights unless they are restrained.

That’s why the Founders enshrined the Second Amendment—not for hunting, but for preserving the people’s right to defend themselves against tyranny. As this article emphasizes, freedom is not a passive entitlement of living in America. It is a responsibility. It requires constant vigilance, especially in the face of creeping government overreach masked as “national security.” It is the responsibility of We the People to hold government agencies and officials accountable.

The Slow Drift Toward a Death Culture in America

On May 20th, Delaware legalized assisted suicide, making it one of 12 states and Washington, DC to permit the practice. Marketed under the familiar slogans of “human dignity” and “compassionate care,” assisted suicide is rapidly becoming a cultural trend. But behind these slogans lies a grim reality. In Canada, Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) has metastasized far beyond its original scope, alarming even the United Nations. This article examines what assisted suicide really is, the dangerous medical myths surrounding it, and the deeper moral consequences of normalizing death as “treatment.”

Canada offers a chilling preview of where this road leads. What began as a “last resort” for the terminally ill is now being pushed for patients with mental illness. Shockingly, the Quebec College of Physicians has even called for extending it to deformed or seriously ill infants. But the core problem was there from the start: assisted suicide is a betrayal of medicine’s fundamental purpose, which is to heal, not to kill.

Laws like Delaware’s typically begin with narrow restrictions—limited to those with a prognosis of six months or less to live. But that’s six months in which disease progression may be able to be slowed or even reversed. We learned during COVID that our medical establishment is far more interested in profit than in patient care. We were told the only hope was a rushed, experimental mRNA injection, while safe, affordable options like ivermectin and HCQ were smeared and suppressed. We continue to be sold the lie that healing comes in a bottle or a syringe, and that patients should “trust the science” even when it robs them of real options—and real hope.

Now, after being failed by pharmaceutical interventions, people are told by their doctors that death is the most dignified path forward. They’re convinced there’s no alternative. But some patients can be cured. Others can live longer than predicted. All of them deserve better than to be quietly discarded by a system that’s forgotten what medicine is for. I’m not saying every terminally ill patient can be saved. I’m saying some can. And in a sane, humane society, that should be enough.